Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Ames Concordance With The In Vivo Transgenic Rodent (TGR) Gene Mutation Assay For NDSRIs And Relative In Vivo TGR Potency With Nitrosamines With Robust Dose-Response Carcinogenicity Data | Lhasa Limited

Ames Concordance with the In Vivo Transgenic Rodent (TGR) Gene Mutation Assay for NDSRIs and Relative In Vivo TGR Potency with Nitrosamines with Robust Dose-Response Carcinogenicity Data

Jolly R; Trejo-Martin A; Bercu J P; Powley M W; Tennant R; Ponting D; Nudelman R; Sobol Z; Czich A; Johnson G; Yang Y; Tetyana C; White P; Minocherhomji S; Lynch A; Zeller A; Ott G; Escobar P; Hobbs C; Schuler M; Puglisi R

Nitrosamines (NAs) are a diverse class of mutagenic impurities encompassing both small molecules and structurally complex drug-related NAs, referred to as nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs). NAs display a broad range of carcinogenic potential, from high carcinogenic potency to being weak or even non-carcinogenic. In vitro Ames tests, conducted with both rat and hamster liver-induced S9, and in vivo transgenic rodent (TGR) mutation assays have been used by pharmaceutical sponsors for hazard identification of NDSRIs. A comparative analysis of Ames tests and TGR results for 33 NDSRIs was performed and revealed an accuracy of 79% between the overall mutagenic calls in the two assays. For NDSRIs with positive TGR results, mutagenic potency estimates were calculated and compared to NAs with robust carcinogenicity and TGR dose-response data. Results from these NAs demonstrated a strong correlation between carcinogenic potency (TD50) and TGR mutagenic potency (BMDL50) (r2 = 0.95), which supports the use of TGR data for both hazard identification and acceptable intake (AI) determination. By integrating quantitative risk assessment tools with TGR assays, this work contributes to a more robust framework for evaluating NA-associated risks.